top of page
  • Writer's pictureNana yaw Dynamic

‘You had no basis to ban celebrities from endorsing alcoholic products’ – Arnold

Arnold Asamoah-Baidoo, an amusement pundit, has voiced analysis against the Food and Drugs Authority (FDA) for prohibiting superstars from embracing alcoholic items.

He contended that the FDA's choice needs observational proof showing the effect of such supports on kids and youth, making the mandate incapable. - Ad - Arnold focused on that the order could be legitimate assuming examination information showed that VIP supports of liquor made negative cultural impacts. "I don't really accept that that being a controller gives you the option to establish regulations that might actually fall another industry.

Any individual who has questions ought to return to the mandate; it was given with no examination or exact information to prove their cases that big names could adversely impact kids and the adolescent through such promotions. "In the UK, where they have guidelines on wagering and different exercises, they furnish observational examination with dates and figures that show the effect on 6,000 youngsters, considering a reasonable comprehension.

However, giving a passerby order without observational proof to help it is a slip-up. What they've done has serious ramifications for the business," he said on UTV's United Showbiz facilitated by MzGee and checked by GhanaWeb.

Meanwhile, people in media outlets have imparted differed insights in regards to the denial of superstar supports for liquor. Some view it as invaluable, while others contend that it won't help industry partners.


AG RADIOListen Live
bottom of page