top of page
  • Writer's pictureNana yaw Dynamic

EOCO to launch lifestyle audits targeting celebrities, individuals with suspected unjustified wealt

The Economic and Organised Crime Office (EOCO) is set to direct broad way of life reviews focusing on superstars and people associated with storing up ridiculous riches, provoked by the new blameworthy request of Ghanaian social media influencer and musician, Hajia4reall, in a $2 million romance scam case.

The choice reflects mounting stresses over the apparent failure of Ghanaian specialists to stem the tide of unlawful enhancement. In a meeting on JoyNews' Forthright, Edward Cudjoe, the head of Organization and Examinations at EOCO, uncovered continuous endeavors to start way of life reviews for those with unexplained riches. "We are driving the charge without anyone else, making specific recommendations for the change of the law to line up with global guidelines.

This guarantees that any holes in your monetary profile are validated by your profit. Any abberations should be explained to policing, the obligation to prove any claims lays on the person to make sense of the beginning of those assets," Edward Cudjoe expressed. Cudjoe focused on EOCO's assurance to move away from the ongoing legitimate system, proposing corrections to line up with worldwide norms. Under the proposed changes, people would be expected to validate any holes in their monetary profiles in view of their profit.

The obligation to prove anything would lie with the person to make sense of the beginning of their assets, even prior to becoming subjects of examinations. Previous Reviewer General Daniel Domelevo added his voice to the discussion, advised that Ghana faces the gamble of capitulating to the impact of street pharmacists in the event that way of life reviews are not quickly executed. Domelevo underscored the deficiency of current frameworks, encouraging a thought of individual protection worries in the more extensive setting of public interest and aggregate prosperity.

"Our frameworks are not good for reason. The contention about attacking somebody's security should be viewed as with regards to public interest or our aggregate prosperity. On the off chance that not tended to immediately, we risk compromising individual privileges for everyone's best interests.

" He cautioned that an inability to resolve the issue expeditiously could think twice about privileges for everyone's best interests.


AG RADIOListen Live
bottom of page